Law is the Foundation of a Free and Humane Society
LAW OFFICES OF PATRICK H. DWYER
The following case descriptions are brief summaries of various civil rights cases brought
by Mr. Dwyer. After the descriptions, copies of the complaint are provided, and for some some
cases, there is also a link to relevant video and exhibits. Please be advised that the video is
disturbing. In the Howie case, there is also a copy of Use of Force manual that was revised as
a condition of the settlement. This UOF manual is based upon the UOF manual that Mr. Dwyer
worked on as part of the Bangert v. Placer County class action.
Pending Civil Rights Cases:
Strickland v. Nevada County, et al., [tort claim being filed]
(Excessive Force and Wrongful Death)
Gabriel Strickland was a young man who was walking on a quiet residential street, carrying
a toy gun. There were no reports that he ever brandished the toy gun, threatened anyone,
trespassed onto private property, or acted in any manner that was a threat to public
safety. The Nevada County Sheriff and the Grass Valley police responded to a call by a
citizen who was concerned about the toy gun was a real gun. Instead of calmly pulling up and
talking to Mr. Strickland, the officers surrounded him with their vehicles, jumped out of their
cars screaming “drop the fucking gun” over and over. Mr. Strickland was known by these officers
as someone that had mental health episodes. Mr. Strickland can be seen and heard in the video
telling the officers it was a toy gun, pointing to the orange band at the end of the barrel and
tapping on the barrel so that the officers would know it was plastic. However, instead of
de-escalating the situation and calling for a trained professional to handle Mr. Strickland, the
officers escalated the situation and mounted an attack with assault rifles. Mr. Strickland stood
there panicked and confused, repeatedly telling the officers that it was a toy gun. The officers
shot him multiple times in the chest and leg. Mr. Strickland bled out on the street and was
pronounced dead upon arrival at the local hospital.
Predybaylo v. Sacramento County, et al., Case No. 2:19-CV-01243 (E.D. Cal.)
(Excessive Force and failure of Medical to Report Injuries to Jail Command)
This is a civil rights action over the use of excessive force by the Sacramento County Sheriff’s
Department against Plaintiff Alexsey Predybaylo. Plaintiff was violently forced to undergo an
unauthorized, post booking strip search. In violation of Sheriff Department policies, Plaintiff
was led by officers into a bare concrete holding cell. With his hands held behind his back and
for no reason, he was violently pulled to the concrete floor, causing a concussion. Video footage
shows Plaintiff completely naked with his face pressed against the concrete floor. One officer
has his leg cross Plaintiff’s neck with his knee on top of Plaintiff’s temple, while another officer
has Plaintiff’s legs in a control hold. Link to video Complaint download.pdf
Peterson v. Nevada County, et al., Case No. 2:19-CV-0949 (E.D. Cal.)
(Excessive Force and Deliberate Indifference to Medical Emergency)
Plaintiff’s leg was injured while being arrested by the City of Grass Valley Police Department.
He was taken to the Nevada County jail where he was booked and placed in a cell. By the
next day an infection developed at the injury site on his leg. He was examined by jail medical
personnel who noted signs of infection in his chart, but then did not follow a standard infection
protocol (e.g., marking the size of the infection and then checking every 30-60 minutes). By the
next day the infection was serious and out of control. Plaintiff was not sent to the local ER and
was not treated at the jail. Instead, late on the second day of infection he was simply dumped
out the door of the jail without any medical instructions and was left him to fend for himself.
Plaintiff was able to get to a nearby gas station where he collapsed. He was taken by ambulance
to the local hospital where he underwent emergency treatment for a Staph A infection. There
were multiple surgical procedures and he spent about 45 days recovering in the hospital.
Complaint download.pdf
Mkrtchyan v. Sacramento County, et al., Case No. 2:17-CV-2366
(Deliberate Indifference to Medical Care and Discriminatory Treatment)
Plaintiff injured both feet while at the Sacramento RCCC jail, bruising his left heel and seriously
breaking his right heel bone. Plaintiff’s right heel needed prompt surgical repair (noted in jail
medical record), but he was never sent for surgery. Instead, Plaintiff was given some crutches
and forced to continue housing in regular jail units with top, not bottom, bunking. Plaintiff had to
drag himself across the floors of bathrooms and showers because he was unassisted and there
were no ADA amenities. When he fell on stairs, guards would tell him to get up, which he could
not do, so he had to crawl up the stairs. Guards disparaged him as a “jihadist” because of his
Armenian features and darker skin color. Without the surgery, Plaintiff’s right heel bone did
heal well and he now has a permanent disability and pain.
Complaint download.pdf
Completed Civil Rights Cases:
Bangert v. Placer County, et al., Case No. 2:17-CV- 01667 (E.D. Cal.)
(Class Action for In-Custody Use of Excessive Force)
This was a class action for pattern and practice of Placer County Sheriff’s officers using excessive
force against inmates at Placer County jails. The excessive force included beatings, tasings, and
inapprpriate use of restraint equipment. There was overwhelming evidence and the case settled
quickly with: (1) a fund for payment of claims by inmates; (2) the adoption of a new Use of Force
Manual after review and revision by plaintiff’s counsel; (3) the inclusion of a check box for
excessive force on the jail grievance form; and (4) a year long audit of all inmate grievances
alleging excessive force that included the review of incident reports, interviews, and video.
Mark Merin and Patrick Dwyer were co-counsel, with Mr. Dwyer focused on the UOF manual,
new grievance form, and year long audit of use of force at the jail. Link to video:
Howie v. Nevada County, et al., 2:18-CV-03146
(Excessive Force and Deliberate Indifference to Medical Needs)
This was a civil rights action for the brutal and senseless use of force upon Plaintiff by Nevada
County Sheriff’s Department personnel that fractured Plaintiff’s right knee. Then, after fracturing
Plaintiff’s knee they put him into wrist and ankle chains and dumped Plaintiff onto his knees
in a holding cell. Plaintiff pleaded for medical attention all night, and despite multiple visits by
Correctional Medical Group Companies, Inc. (aka Wellpath) personnel, Plaintiff was denied
any medical treatment. The next morning, the Nevada County Sheriff and Wellpath personnel
rolled Plaintiff out the back door of the jail in a wheel chair, lifted him out, set him down on
he curb and left him to call his own ambulance. Link to video: Complaint download.pdf
The case settled for a substantial payment and required the Nevada County Sheriffs Department
to adopt a new use of force policy and a new medical policy. New UOF Manual: download.pdf
Akey v. Placer County, et al., Case No. 2:14-CV-02402 (E.D. Cal.)
(Unconstitutional Interference With Parent-Child Relationship)
The Plaintiffs were Rachel Akay and her minor son. Without any warning, without a court order,
and without any substantiated evidence, the Placer County CPS removed Ms. Akey’s minor son
from her custody for alleged abuse and neglect. There was no interview of the mother or the
alleged abuser, and only a minimal investigation that produced no evidence of any abuse or
neglect of the child. Plaintiff sued the CPS worker and supervisor for violation of her constitutional
right to a parent-child relationship. Plaintiff also sued Placer County under Monell for failure to
train and enforce established practices and procedures for evaluating the safety of a child.
Defendants argued that Plaintiff had agreed to the removal of her child under a so-called
“oral safety plan”. After a two week trial, the jury found for Plaintiffs on five of six causes of action
and awarded $700,000, plus attorney’s fees. There was an error by the court on the jury verdict
form, so rather than go through a re-trial, the parties settled. In addition to the settlement,
Placer County CPS re-trained its CPS workers in the use of all state and federal prescribed
safety assessment documentation and procedures and it abandoned the practice of un-written
safety plans. Complaint download.pdf
Coleman v. Placer County, et al., Case no. 2:17-CV- (E.D. Cal.)
(Excessive Use of Force, Malicious Prosecution, Destruction of Evidence)
This action arose from the wrongful arrest of Plaintiff and then his beating at the Placer County
Jail by a group of Placer County Sheriff officers. Plaintiff was then criminally charged with
resisting arrest and obstructing a police officer. During discovery in the criminal case, Mr. Dwyer
found several instances of evidence destruction by the police. The DA did nothing to correct the
evidentiary problem, but after video was produced showing when, where and by whom Plaintiff
was beaten at the jail, the criminal case was dropped. Plaintiff then filed a civil rights action for
the excessive force with additional counts against the DA and Placer County for the destruction
of evidence and malicious prosecution. The case settled for a substantial sum.
Complaint: download.pdf Complaint Exhibits: download.pdf
Kershner v. Placer County, et al., Case no. 2:17-CV-02312 (E.D. Cal.)
(Excessive Use of Force)
This was an action for the beating of Plaintiff at the Placer County Jail by Placer County
Sheriff officers. After discovery of video evidence showing when, where and by whom Plaintiff
was beaten at the jail, the case was settled. Complaint: download.pdf
Langley v. Placer County, et al., Case no. 2:17-CV-0760 (E.D. Cal.)
(Excessive Use of Force)
This was an action for the beating of Plaintiff at the Placer County Jail by Placer County
Sheriff officers. After discovery of video evidence showing when, where and by whom Plaintiff
was beaten at the jail, the case was settled. Complaint: download.pdf
Phu v. Placer County, et al., Case No. 2:16-CV-0995 (E.D. Cal.)
(Unconstitutional Interference With Parent-Child Relationship)
The Placer County CPS removed the two daughters of Ms. Phu from her custody without a
court order and without any substantiated evidence of any neglect or abuse. The action was
settled with a financial payment and restoration of custody. Complaint: download.pdf
JUSTICE UNDER
THE LAW
NO ONE ABOVE
THE LAW
530-432-5407
pdwyer@pdwyerlaw.com